Activesupport Concern

Find all needed information about Activesupport Concern. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about Activesupport Concern.


ActiveSupport::Concern - Ruby on Rails

    https://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveSupport/Concern.html
    require 'active_support/concern' module Foo extend ActiveSupport::Concern included do def self.method_injected_by_foo ... end end end module Bar extend ActiveSupport::Concern include Foo included do self.method_injected_by_foo end end class Host include Bar # It works, now Bar takes care of its dependencies end

rails/concern.rb at master · rails/rails · GitHub

    https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/activesupport/lib/active_support/concern.rb
    Apr 17, 2019 · rails / activesupport / lib / active_support / concern.rb Find file Copy path okuramasafumi Add documentations to AS::Concern#included and #class_methods 8dcce70 …

Ruby Mixins & ActiveSupport::Concern — Appfolio Engineering

    http://engineering.appfolio.com/appfolio-engineering/2013/06/17/ruby-mixins-activesupportconcern
    Jun 17, 2013 · Is every mixin a Concern? No. Is every ActiveSupport::Concern a Concern? No. While I've used ActiveSupport::Concern to build actual Concerns, I've also used it to avoid writing out the boilerplate code mentioned above. If I just need to share some instance methods and nothing else, then I'll use a bare module.

Why I Don't Use ActiveSupport::Concern - On Being A ...

    http://blog.coreyhaines.com/2012/12/why-i-dont-use-activesupportconcern.html
    I don't use ActiveSupport::Concern. Unlike other Rails-based bastardization of concepts and names, ActiveSupport::Concern has very little to do with common connotations of "concern." It tightly couples a useful design concept to a single, possibly-least-optimal implementation of the idea (mixins).

Rails: Including a Concern with a constant within a Concern

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15953332/rails-including-a-concern-with-a-constant-within-a-concern
    It appears this behavior is by design, as explained nicely over here.. What you'll need to do in this case is not have Group::Constants extend from ActiveSupport::Concern since that will block its implementation from being shared with other ActiveSupport::Concern extending modules (although it will be ultimately shared in a class that includes the second module):

ActiveSupport::Concern 小结 · Ruby China

    https://ruby-china.org/topics/19812
    Mar 29, 2019 · ActiveSupport::Concern 被引入到 rails. 根据这篇文章 put-chubby-models-on-a-diet-with-concerns 中这样一段话把它的意思说的很明白了:. This concern can then be mixed into all the models that are taggable and you’ll have a single place to update the logic and reason about it.

ACTIVE.com Help & Support - activesupport.force.com

    http://activesupport.force.com/usersupport/
    Road Runner Sports Partnership – Frequently Asked Questions: Save Big on a Wide Range of Family Activities with ACTIVE Advantage: Save Big on all your Outdoor Needs with ACTIVE Advantage!

ActiveSupport::Concern - APIdock

    https://apidock.com/rails/ActiveSupport/Concern
    require ' active_support/concern ' module Foo extend ActiveSupport:: Concern included do def self.method_injected_by_foo... end end end module Bar extend ActiveSupport:: Concern include Foo included do self. method_injected_by_foo end end class Host include Bar # It works, now Bar takes care of its dependencies end



Need to find Activesupport Concern information?

To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.

Related Support Info