Find all needed information about Cache Concurrency Strategy Support. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about Cache Concurrency Strategy Support.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3058894/what-cache-concurrency-strategy-should-be-used-for-manytoone-fields
What cache concurrency strategy should be used for @ManyToOne fields for a particular entity class. Would it make sense to use READ_ONLY instead of READ_WRITE, since these fields usually don't change after entity creation
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/core.old/reference/en/html/performance-cache.html
The transactional cache strategy provides support for fully transactional cache providers such as JBoss TreeCache. Such a cache may only be used in a JTA environment and you must specify hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class. 19.2.6.
https://vladmihalcea.com/how-does-hibernate-read_only-cacheconcurrencystrategy-work/
Apr 27, 2015 · Since the Changes are immutable too, we would like to cache them as well, to save unnecessary database round-trips. Enabling Collection cache support. Collections are not cached by default, and to enable this behavior, we have to annotate them with the cache concurrency strategy:
https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2690681
Requesting READ_WRITE cache concurrency strategy but the cache was configured as transactional. Using CacheConcurrencyStrategy.NONSTRICT_READ_WRITE or CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_WRITE with Hibernate/Infinispan in EAP 7 - Red Hat Customer Portal
https://docs.atlassian.com/hibernate2/2.1.8/api/net/sf/hibernate/cache/CacheConcurrencyStrategy.html
A non transaction-aware cache would be wrapped by an "asynchronous" concurrency strategy, where items are merely "soft locked" during the transaction and then updated during the "after transaction completion" phase. The soft lock is not an actual lock on the database row - only upon the cached representation of the item.
https://codespot.net/2014/02/03/hibernate-caching-strategies/
What’s nice about this strategy is that on contention, it let’s the database handle the concurrent access, meaning that the isolation level provided is resolved by the database, as if there was no cache at all. Now this seems perfectly reasonable… Yet, there is one shortcoming to this strategy as well: it stores these soft-lock in a cache.
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/core/3.3/reference/en/html/performance.html
The transactional cache strategy provides support for fully transactional cache providers such as JBoss TreeCache. Such a cache can only be used in a JTA environment and you must specify hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class .
https://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/entitymanager/3.5/javadoc/org/hibernate/cache/CacheConcurrencyStrategy.html
A non transaction-aware cache would be wrapped by an "asynchronous" concurrency strategy, where items are merely "soft locked" during the transaction and then updated during the "after transaction completion" phase; the soft lock is not an actual lock on the database row - only upon the cached representation of the item.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3472613/does-ehcache-2-1-support-the-transactional-cache-concurrency-strategy-in-hiberna
Does Ehcache 2.1 now support the transactional cache concurrency strategy in Hibernate 3.3.2GA? That is, does Hibernate, when configured to use Ehcache 2.1 as its cache provider, allow the <cache usage="transactional"/> element in a mapping file or the Hibernate entity class annotation @Cache(usage=CacheConcurrencyStrategy.READ_WRITE)?
Need to find Cache Concurrency Strategy Support information?
To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.
