Find all needed information about Federal Child Support Performance Measures. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about Federal Child Support Performance Measures.
https://csdaca.org/about-child-support/federal-performance-measures/
The Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998 enacted significant changes in the way federal incentives are paid to states. The methodology changed from being based on cost-effectiveness only, to five federal performance measures implemented over a …
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/sbtn_csp_focused_on_performance.pdf
the child support program in 1998 (P.L. 105-200) when it enacted . the Child Support Performance and Incentive Act (CSPIA). The core of this system consists of five performance measures that reflect the statutory purposes of the program: paternity estab-lishment, order establishment, collections on current support,
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/css/resource/child-support-performance-and-incentive-act-of-1998
To provide for an alternative penalty procedure for States that fail to meet Federal child support data processing requirements, to reform Federal incentive payments for effective child support performance, to provide for a more flexible penalty procedure for States that violate interjurisdictional adoption requirements, and for other purposes.
https://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2018/Other/180484.pdf
Minnesota’s 2017 Child Support Performance Report presents the . program’s status and highlights accomplishments during FFY 2017. The Child Support Division (CSD) reports the most recent data showing statewide and individual county performance, and a five-year history for the five federal performance measures. The five performance measures ...
https://childsupport.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/252/Budgets&Reports/2019-10-25-Preliminary-FFY-2019-Comparative-Data-Report_ADA.pdf
Oct 25, 2019 · state of california - health and human services agency department of child support services child support program statistics preliminary federal fiscal year 2019 table 01.1.1 comparison of federal performance measures as calculated in supporting tables federal fiscal years 2018 and 2019 iv-d paternity establishment percentage (pep) cases with
https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/modernizing-federal-child-support-program.html
Nov 21, 2016 · Partly as a result of using data to inform day-to-day practice, Pennsylvania is the only state that meets or exceeds the 80 percent standard set by the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement for the four federal child support performance metrics on …
https://www.slocounty.ca.gov/Departments/Child-Support/Department-News/County-Child-Support-Services-Ranks-No-1-in-State.aspx
The rankings were based on the five federal performance measures during federal fiscal year 2016-2017, which runs October through September. While this is the fifth consecutive year the County has earned this title, it has been recognized as having the top-rated child support services in the state for 11 of the last 12 years.
https://csdaca.org/about-child-support/federal-performance-measures/
The Child Support Performance and Incentive Act of 1998 enacted significant changes in the way federal incentives are paid to states. The methodology changed from being based on cost-effectiveness only, to five federal performance measures implemented over a three year period, beginning October 1, 1999.
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/programs/css/sbtn_csp_focused_on_performance.pdf
the child support program in 1998 (P.L. 105-200) when it enacted . the Child Support Performance and Incentive Act (CSPIA). The core of this system consists of five performance measures that reflect the statutory purposes of the program: paternity estab-lishment, order …
https://www.acf.hhs.gov/css/resource/child-support-performance-and-incentive-act-of-1998
To provide for an alternative penalty procedure for States that fail to meet Federal child support data processing requirements, to reform Federal incentive payments for effective child support performance, to provide for a more flexible penalty procedure for States that violate interjurisdictional adoption requirements, and for other purposes.
https://www.leg.state.mn.us/docs/2018/Other/180484.pdf
Thank you for your interest in the 2017 Minnesota Child Support Performance Report. Based on preliminary 2017 Federal Fiscal Year (FFY) data, Minnesota’s federal performance measures increased in two categories and decreased in two. We continue to rank in the top five nationally in the percentage of cases with a payment
https://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-adminstration.aspx
Apr 01, 2013 · Child Support 101 is a compilation of online documents that explain the child support process and services. It is broken in to four areas: child support basics, administration, enforcement and family centered services. 1 Each of those areas is broken into a variety of online documents that detail the process and state involvement in those processes. . You may view the full contents of this ...
https://mn.gov/dhs/assets/2017-01-child-support-report_tcm1053-280434.pdf
Each year, state child support programs report on several performance measures to the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE). The data are analyzed by OCSE and published the summer of the following year. Minnesota continues to strive to be among the top performing states on the five federal performance measures, and in other key ...
https://csdaca.org/about-child-support/state-performance-measures/
Family Code Section 17602 requires the Department of Child Support Services (DCSS) to adopt performance standards effective January 1, 2001.The performance standards outlined in Family Code Section 17602 (a) are adopted as the state performance measures. In addition DCSS adopted the five federal performance measures.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/305.2
chapter iii. office of child support enforcement (child support enforcement program), administration for children and families, department of health and human services; part 305. program performance measures, standards, financial incentives, and penalties; section 305.2. performance measures.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/45/305.40
Performance in the 40 percent to 49 percent range with no significant increase will not be penalized but neither will it qualify for an incentive payment. Table 5 shows at which level of performance a State will incur a penalty under the child support order establishment measure.
https://www.gao.gov/products/HEHS/GGD-97-14
The new structure, as proposed to the Congress in February 1997, would measure state performance in five areas: establishment of paternities, establishment of child support orders, collections of current child support due, collections of past due child support…
https://www.pmi.org/learning/library/performance-measurement-index-federal-agencies-6124
A performance measurement index provides an innovative approach for federal agencies to focus on performance improvement in accordance with guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Deloitte's Performance Measurement Index requires agency leaders to discuss how priorities and goals are aligned with programs, projects, and budgets.
https://www.media.pa.gov/Pages/DHS_details.aspx?newsid=169
Pennsylvania is the only state to meet or exceed all five federally mandated performance measures established by the Child Support Performance and Incentive Act. The commonwealth, working closely with the Pennsylvania County Domestic Relations Sections, has met the federal measures every year since 2009.
https://www.placer.ca.gov/482/Child-Support-Services-ranks-fourth-out-
Feb 08, 2018 · Placer County Child Support Services ranks fourth out of 49 in state performance measures for 2017. Published on February 08, 2018. Placer County Department of Child Support Services ranked fourth out of 49 local child support agencies in California for federal fiscal year 2017.
https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/RL34203.pdf
Child Support Enforcement Program Incentive Payments: Background and Policy Issues Congressional Research Service Summary The Child Support Enforcement (CSE) program, enacted in 1975, to help strengthen families by securing financial support from noncustodial parents, is funded with both state and federal dollars.
https://www.cga.ct.gov/2014/rpt/2014-R-0012.htm
TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS IN CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT. According to BCSE, the Pennsylvania Child Support Enforcement Program has developed highly automated systems that give DRS staff tools that (1) expedite case processing, (2) encourage a focus on difficult-to-collect cases, and (3) target cases based on the federal performance measures.
https://lao.ca.gov/2000/012700_child_support/012700_child_support.html
Jan 27, 2000 · In addition, the director is required to submit quarterly reports on the progress of all local child support agencies in each performance measure, including the identification of the local child support agencies that are out of compliance, the performance measures each has failed to satisfy, and the performance plan that is adopted for each.
https://healthdata.gov/dataset/department-human-servicesdhs-child-support-enforcement-administration-performance-measures
CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION. The performance measures are used to evaluate each State's performance and measure results in the Child Support Enforcement program. These measures emphasize paternity establishment, support order establishment, collection of current support, collection of arrearages, and cost effectiveness.
https://www.gsa.gov/policy-regulations/policy/federal-advisory-committee-management/performance-measurement
Performance Measurement. An increasing number of federal agencies have turned to the use of advisory committees over the last several decades for guidance on public policy or technical review of government-funded projects. An important and potentially contentious issue surrounding the use of advisory committees is how to judge their success.
https://placer.ca.gov/news/2018/february/css-rankings-2017
Placer County Child Support Services ranks fourth out of 49 in state performance measures for 2017. February 08, 2018. Placer County Department of Child Support Services ranked fourth out of 49 local child support agencies in California for federal fiscal year 2017.
http://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/child-support-digest-volume-7-number-1.aspx
Child support is one of the most cost-effective programs, with $5.15 being collected for every dollar spent. Each year, the federal Office of Child Support Enforcement releases a report to Congress detailing 50-state data on numerous child support measures.
Need to find Federal Child Support Performance Measures information?
To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.