Find all needed information about Warning No So Timestamp Support Falling Back To Siocgstamp. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about Warning No So Timestamp Support Falling Back To Siocgstamp.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/guinness-list/2000-December/msg00800.html
I think it's trying to use the TSC (Time Stamp Counter ?) function of the CPU. It should be more accurate that way. I tried it because: 1) the warning mentioned _falling_ back to SIOCGSTAMP 2) the -U option said "(the old behaviour)" And it quieted the warning :) Now why My athlon with TSC in the CPU doesn't use SO_TIMESTAMP is probably a bug.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/guinness-list/2000-December/msg00767.html
James I used to find this realy annoying. I use redhat 6.2 and came accross this when I updated to iputils-20001010-1.6x.i386.rpm. Then one day it disappeared. This coincided with a kernel rebuild. I suspect that you are running the default kernel which doesn't support SO_TIMESTAMP. hope this helps ...
https://answers.splunk.com/answers/779316/does-splunk-log-falling-back-to-automatic-timestam.html
If I don't hear back from you, then, based on your answer and subsequent comments, I believe that the answer to my original question ("Does Splunk log falling back to automatic timestamp extraction?") is "no". I'll add a comment to your answer to that effect, and, with thanks for your input, accept your answer.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/36041740/obtain-packet-timestamp-through-ioctl-call-on-socket-file-descriptor
Obtain packet timestamp through ioctl call on socket file descriptor. Ask Question ... I'm trying this now with SIOCGSTAMP, I've set SO_TIMESTAMP option to 0 with setsockopt. However the ioctl call is still returning -1. Must I enable the SIOCGSTAMP or can it be that it is not supported by the device driver? ... so he has scaled back his ...
https://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/5776051/
BackupPC Mailing Lists Brought to you by: cbarratt , stephen14
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11731445/timestamp-outgoing-packets
SO_TIMESTAMP / SO_TIMESTAMPNS / SO_TIMESTAMPING / SIOCGSTAMP / SIOCGSTAMPNS are similar. Anyone of them will enable application getting the timestamp of a received packet. With SOF_TIMESTAMPING_TX_SOFTWARE, any one of the above flags will also provide the application a CMSG in MSG_ERRQUEUE, indicating the timestamp of a sent packet.
https://support.cloudbees.com/hc/en-us/articles/209641937-How-to-configure-Access-Control-for-Builds-
Apr 06, 2018 · How to configure Access Control for Builds? ... Warning: you have no plugins providing access control for builds, so falling back to legacy behavior of permitting any downstream builds to be triggered or. Warning: `Access Control for Builds` in global security configuration is empty, so falling back to legacy behavior of permitting any ...
http://lion3875.blog.sohu.com/156720503.html
Jul 19, 2010 · SO_TIMESTAMP，一个Socket选项，在权威著作《Unix网络编程》中未提及到，即使在google上也难找到其详细解释与用法。然而在开源代码ptpv2d-rc1中用到了这个socket选项，那么它到底是用来做什么的呢。
Need to find Warning No So Timestamp Support Falling Back To Siocgstamp information?
To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.
