You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6

Find all needed information about You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6.


ruby on rails - How can I fix error below "but your ...

    https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4701820/how-can-i-fix-error-below-but-your-gemfile-requires-activesupport-3-0-0
    11.3k 3 3 gold badges 32 32 silver badges 36 36 bronze badges Bundle Exec all the way - every time - it will save you a load of hassle. Otherwise switch to a Unicorn Server.

Gem::LoadError: You have already activated activesupport 2 ...

    https://github.com/basecamp/pow/issues/374
    May 08, 2013 · GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together. Sign up Gem::LoadError: You have already activated activesupport 2.3.18, but your Gemfile requires activesupport 3.0.20.

Failure during 'after bundler': You have already activated ...

    https://github.com/RailsApps/rails_apps_composer/issues/146
    Dec 14, 2012 · Error: You have already activated sprockets 2.2.1, but your Gemfile requires sprockets 2.2.2. Using bundle exec may solve this. This comment has been minimized.

[Cucumber] Diff between bundle exec cucumber and cucumber ...

    https://grokbase.com/t/gg/cukes/12b57yq2bj/cucumber-diff-between-bundle-exec-cucumber-and-cucumber-when-we-fire
    You have already activated activesupport 3.2.8, but your Gemfile requires activesupport 3.2.4. Using bundle exec may solve this. (Gem::LoadError) But when i …

" You have already activated rack 1.1.0, but your Gemfile ...

    https://pastebin.com/QMrUY90H
    " You have already activated rack 1.1.0, but your Gemfile requires rack 1.0.1. Consider using bundle exec."

You have already activated rake 0.9.6, but your Gemfile ...

    https://www.zhihu.com/question/23556824
    You have already activated rake 0.9.6, but your Gemfile requires rake 0.9.2.2. Prepending `bundle exec` to your command may solve this. 建github个人博客的时候遇到这个问题,系统版本号是os x 10.9.3,搜了google,看了好多个但还是无法解决,希望有大大帮我一下。

rakeでエラー You have already activated rake xx.x.x, but your ...

    https://qiita.com/ARTS_papa/items/41e2868273dd344cd317
    rakeでエラー You have already activated rake xx.x.x, but your Gemfile requires rake xx.x.x.での対処の仕方 備忘録 Ruby Rails rake More than 3 years have passed since last update.

"You have already activated json 1.8.0..." with 0.13.4 ...

    https://github.com/burke/zeus/issues/378
    Jul 14, 2013 · I was able to run bundle clean --force to remove all gems not in use in the context of the current gemfile. This of course is just a temporary fix until some other application (using the same version of Ruby as the repo which is having trouble running Zeus) installs some other incompatible gem.

Cannot run wpscan after updating Kali · Issue #1243 ...

    https://github.com/wpscanteam/wpscan/issues/1243
    @ethicalhack3r Yes this happens when trying to run wpscan directly from the terminal, with any or no flags. @FireFart and @erwanlr Should I uninstall and re-install Ruby, then re-install wpscan? I am not a Ruby developer, but I would not have thought installing the version of a gem it was complaining about missing would break it.

'check_version_conflict': using 'rails new', with ... - GitHub

    https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/29113
    May 16, 2017 · secondly, find_in_unresolved_tree relies on has_conflicts? to filter plausible-sounding paths to the desired gem, and ends up choosing a path through a newer version of activesupport, even though another has already been activated, because has_conflicts? checks the dependencies of loaded gems, but doesn't check for a different version of that ...



Need to find You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6 information?

To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.

Related Support Info