Find all needed information about You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4701820/how-can-i-fix-error-below-but-your-gemfile-requires-activesupport-3-0-0
11.3k 3 3 gold badges 32 32 silver badges 36 36 bronze badges Bundle Exec all the way - every time - it will save you a load of hassle. Otherwise switch to a Unicorn Server.
https://github.com/basecamp/pow/issues/374
May 08, 2013 · GitHub is home to over 40 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together. Sign up Gem::LoadError: You have already activated activesupport 2.3.18, but your Gemfile requires activesupport 3.0.20.
https://github.com/RailsApps/rails_apps_composer/issues/146
Dec 14, 2012 · Error: You have already activated sprockets 2.2.1, but your Gemfile requires sprockets 2.2.2. Using bundle exec may solve this. This comment has been minimized.
https://grokbase.com/t/gg/cukes/12b57yq2bj/cucumber-diff-between-bundle-exec-cucumber-and-cucumber-when-we-fire
You have already activated activesupport 3.2.8, but your Gemfile requires activesupport 3.2.4. Using bundle exec may solve this. (Gem::LoadError) But when i …
https://pastebin.com/QMrUY90H
" You have already activated rack 1.1.0, but your Gemfile requires rack 1.0.1. Consider using bundle exec."
https://www.zhihu.com/question/23556824
You have already activated rake 0.9.6, but your Gemfile requires rake 0.9.2.2. Prepending `bundle exec` to your command may solve this. 建github个人博客的时候遇到这个问题，系统版本号是os x 10.9.3，搜了google，看了好多个但还是无法解决，希望有大大帮我一下。
https://qiita.com/ARTS_papa/items/41e2868273dd344cd317
rakeでエラー You have already activated rake xx.x.x, but your Gemfile requires rake xx.x.x.での対処の仕方 備忘録 Ruby Rails rake More than 3 years have passed since last update.
https://github.com/burke/zeus/issues/378
Jul 14, 2013 · I was able to run bundle clean --force to remove all gems not in use in the context of the current gemfile. This of course is just a temporary fix until some other application (using the same version of Ruby as the repo which is having trouble running Zeus) installs some other incompatible gem.
https://github.com/wpscanteam/wpscan/issues/1243
@ethicalhack3r Yes this happens when trying to run wpscan directly from the terminal, with any or no flags. @FireFart and @erwanlr Should I uninstall and re-install Ruby, then re-install wpscan? I am not a Ruby developer, but I would not have thought installing the version of a gem it was complaining about missing would break it.
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/29113
May 16, 2017 · secondly, find_in_unresolved_tree relies on has_conflicts? to filter plausible-sounding paths to the desired gem, and ends up choosing a path through a newer version of activesupport, even though another has already been activated, because has_conflicts? checks the dependencies of loaded gems, but doesn't check for a different version of that ...
Need to find You Have Already Activated Activesupport 3 2 6 information?
To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.
