Find all needed information about Rfc 2817 Support. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about Rfc 2817 Support.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=276813
This is a request for Mozilla to support TLS Upgrades inside HTTP 1.1 as specified in RFC 2817. RFC 2817 is currently supported in the Apache HTTPD 2.1 Development branch. Several other less popular servers also support it.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=355435
Mar 05, 2006 · retitle 355435 Support RFC 2817 / TLS Upgrade for HTTP 1.1 forwarded 355435 https: ... Are you asking if I'm interested in applying a patch to support this outside of upstream? I think the idea of RFC 2817 is a good one, but I think this would likely be too …
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4217
RFC 2228 Extensions to the FTP protocol to allow negotiation of security mechanisms to allow authentication, confidentiality, and message integrity. This document is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that provided for SMTP in RFC 3207 and HTTP in RFC 2817 .Cited by: 30
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7230
RFC 7230 HTTP/1.1 Message Syntax and Routing June 2014 To minimize the risk of theft or accidental publication, log information ought to be purged of personally identifiable information, including user identifiers, IP addresses, and user-provided query parameters, as soon as that information is no longer necessary to support operational needs ...
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4102103/how-well-supported-is-the-http-upgrade-mechanism
I have been studying the Upgrade header field in HTTP 1.1 (RFC 2817) and happened to read the wikipedia entry for HTTP. That article has the following statement: "Browser support for the Upgrade header is, however, nearly non-existent, so HTTPS is still the dominant method of establishing a secure HTTP connection."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RFC_2616
RFC 1945 officially introduced and recognized HTTP V1.0 in 1996. The HTTP WG planned to publish new standards in December 1995 and the support for pre-standard HTTP/1.1 based on the then developing RFC 2068 (called HTTP-NG) was rapidly adopted by the majorDeveloped by: initially CERN; IETF, W3C
https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/HTTP11
Squid is missing support for chunked encoding trailers. Squid is missing support for deflate and gzip transfer encodings. Squid is missing support for HTTP message Trailers. Specification Document: RFC 2817. Squid is conditionally compliant with this feature. Always ignores the header content and ensures Upgrade header is dropped safely.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4217
This document is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that provided for SMTP in RFC 2487, "SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security", and HTTP in RFC 2817, "Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.". This specification is in accordance with RFC 959, "File Transfer Protocol".
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc4217/
This document is intended to provide TLS support for FTP in a similar way to that provided for SMTP in RFC 2487, "SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over Transport Layer Security", and HTTP in RFC 2817, "Upgrading to TLS Within HTTP/1.1.". This specification is in accordance with RFC 959, "File Transfer Protocol".
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HTTPCORE-158
Presently HttpCore provides support for HTTP CONNECT method for establishing end-to-end tunnels across HTTP proxies as specified in the RFC 2817. However, HttpCore currently does not support 'Upgrade' / 101 (Switching Protocols) handshaking, which does not seem as widely used by the common HTTP agents and servers as HTTP CONNECT.
Need to find Rfc 2817 Support information?
To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.
