Find all needed information about Does Not Support Serializing Generic Types. Below you can see links where you can find everything you want to know about Does Not Support Serializing Generic Types.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/26728894/soap-serializer-does-not-support-serializing-generic-types
SerializationException was ungandled by user code Soap Serializer does not support serializing Generic Types : System.Collections.Generic.List`1[SoapwbApp.Hotel].
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/c4d67e93-fa11-46d9-aa4f-b63960f6af91/ouch-soap-serialization-for-nullable-types-is-missing
Apr 30, 2010 · Unfortunately, we decided not to invest any more resources into the SoapFormatter, and so no new features were added to it in .NET Framework 2.0. There will be a new serialization engine included with the Windows Communication Foundation, the XmlFormatter, which will be a much better mechanism for turning [Serializable] types into readable XML.
https://weblogs.asp.net/fbouma/432971
Dec 12, 2005 · Works great, well, if you use the BinaryFormatter that is. Try using the SoapFormatter, and you're in for a big surprise: Soap Serializer does not support serializing Generic Types. I couldn't believe my eyes. So of course, I googled and I ran into this thread on forums.microsoft.com.
http://www.databaseforum.info/25/672861.aspx
Posted: .NET Remoting and Runtime Serialization, Soap Serializer does not support serializing Generic Types. Top. Actually XmlSerializer IS NOT an excellent option. It basically cannot serialize private members (public properties are pretty limiting), which is …
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/5539973/soap-generic-type-serialization
The SOAP serializer doesn't support generic types. Microsoft recommends using WCF http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172342(v=VS.100).aspx. Before WCF, I remember them recommending the XML serializer.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1212742/xml-serialize-generic-list-of-serializable-objects
@Fred the XmlSerializer(Type) constructor creates a temp assembly to handle the serialization for that type and adds it to the AppDomain, but if you call it a second time for the same type, it does not re-use the same temp assembly, it creates another one.
https://cslanet.com/old-forum/6951.html
May 15, 2009 · That is probably not good. While I think technically Microsoft still supports the SoapFormatter, I suspect it has fallen so far out of use that it is no longer completely compatible with the BinaryFormatter - and thus with modern .NET type concepts like generics.
https://www.codeproject.com/articles/20096/custom-serialization-using-the-soap-formatter-adva
Aug 19, 2007 · The identifier must contain the class name in this case, because custom serialization does not really support inheritance. If you would use Version constants in the base class and in the derived class, the Soap Formatter will complain that it cannot serialize the same object twice.
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/wcf/feature-details/types-supported-by-the-data-contract-serializer
Nullable types are fully supported by the data contract serializer. Interface types are treated either as Object or, in the case of collection interfaces, as collection types. Both structures and classes are supported. The DataContractSerializer does not support the programming model used by the XmlSerializer and ASP.NET Web
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2074240/serializing-a-nullabledatetime-in-to-xml
Serializing a Nullable<DateTime> in to XML. Ask Question Asked 9 years, 10 months ago. ... or is it by catching the exception thrown by AccountExpirationDate.Value that it does not serialize? How does this work? ... Nullable type as a generic parameter possible? 88. Serialize a nullable int. 4.
Need to find Does Not Support Serializing Generic Types information?
To find needed information please read the text beloow. If you need to know more you can click on the links to visit sites with more detailed data.